Vulpes cana (carnivore)
Mass: 1.2 kg based on Cunningham and Howarth 2002 and Smith et al. 2003
Diet: insectivore-frugivore based on Geffen et al. 1992; invertivore-frugivore based on Cunningham and Howarth 2002
Abundance: 0.51 to 2.30%
Latitudinal range: 16.6° to 17.2°Habitats: desert/xeric shrubland (1), tropical/subtropical dry broadleaf forest (1)
Found in two samples
Oman: Southwest Dhofar Mountains
Yemen: Hawf
Size measurements:
♀ body mass | 1442 kg | N = 1 | Cunningham and Howarth 2002 |
♀ body mass | 955 g | N = 1 | Cunningham and Howarth 2002 |
♀ body mass | 1245 kg | N = 1 | Cunningham and Howarth 2002 |
♀ body mass | 1200 kg | N = 1 | Cunningham and Howarth 2002 |
♀ body mass | 955 g | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♀ body mass | 1442 kg | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♀ body mass | 1245 kg | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♀ body mass | 950 g | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♀ body mass | 1450 kg | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♀ body mass | 1180 kg | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♀ body mass | 1280 kg | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♀ body mass | 1200 kg | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♀ body mass | 1180 kg | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♂ body mass | 1248 kg | N = 1 | Cunningham and Howarth 2002 |
♂ body mass | 1242 kg | N = 1 | Cunningham and Howarth 2002 |
♂ body mass | 1242 kg | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♂ body mass | 1248 kg | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♂ body mass | 1550 kg | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♂ body mass | 1000 g | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♂ body mass | 1500 kg | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♂ body mass | 1280 kg | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♀ ear length | 89 mm | N = 1 | Cunningham and Howarth 2002 |
♀ ear length | 85 mm | N = 1 | Cunningham and Howarth 2002 |
♀ ear length | 85 mm | N = 1 | Cunningham and Howarth 2002 |
♀ ear length | 84 mm | N = 1 | Cunningham and Howarth 2002 |
♀ ear length | 87 mm | N = 1 | Cunningham and Howarth 2002 |
♀ ear length | 91 mm | N = 1 | Cunningham and Howarth 2002 |
♀ ear length | 89 mm | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♀ ear length | 85 mm | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♀ ear length | 85 mm | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♀ ear length | 84 mm | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♀ ear length | 87 mm | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♀ ear length | 85 mm | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♀ ear length | 85 mm | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♀ ear length | 85 mm | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♀ ear length | 91 mm | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♀ ear length | 82 mm | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♀ ear length | 88 mm | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♂ ear length | 87 mm | N = 1 | Cunningham and Howarth 2002 |
♂ ear length | 91 mm | N = 1 | Cunningham and Howarth 2002 |
♂ ear length | 82 mm | N = 1 | Cunningham and Howarth 2002 |
♂ ear length | 80 mm | N = 1 | Cunningham and Howarth 2002 |
♂ ear length | 87 mm | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♂ ear length | 91 mm | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♂ ear length | 80 mm | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♂ ear length | 82 mm | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♂ ear length | 85 mm | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♂ ear length | 95 mm | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♂ ear length | 85 mm | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♂ ear length | 83 mm | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♀ hind foot length | 88 mm | N = 1 | Cunningham and Howarth 2002 |
♀ hind foot length | 100 mm | N = 1 | Cunningham and Howarth 2002 |
♀ hind foot length | 90 mm | N = 1 | Cunningham and Howarth 2002 |
♀ hind foot length | 100 mm | N = 1 | Cunningham and Howarth 2002 |
♀ hind foot length | 85 mm | N = 1 | Cunningham and Howarth 2002 |
♀ hind foot length | 99 mm | N = 1 | Cunningham and Howarth 2002 |
♀ hind foot length | 88 mm | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♀ hind foot length | 90 mm | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♀ hind foot length | 100 mm | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♀ hind foot length | 100 mm | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♀ hind foot length | 85 mm | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♀ hind foot length | 90 mm | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♀ hind foot length | 100 mm | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♀ hind foot length | 95 mm | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♀ hind foot length | 97 mm | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♀ hind foot length | 93 mm | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♀ hind foot length | 90 mm | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♂ hind foot length | 91 mm | N = 1 | Cunningham and Howarth 2002 |
♂ hind foot length | 100 mm | N = 1 | Cunningham and Howarth 2002 |
♂ hind foot length | 98 mm | N = 1 | Cunningham and Howarth 2002 |
♂ hind foot length | 105 mm | N = 1 | Cunningham and Howarth 2002 |
♂ hind foot length | 91 mm | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♂ hind foot length | 100 mm | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♂ hind foot length | 105 mm | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♂ hind foot length | 98 mm | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♂ hind foot length | 95 mm | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♂ hind foot length | 98 mm | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♂ hind foot length | 100 mm | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♂ hind foot length | 94 mm | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♀ tail length | 317 mm | N = 1 | Cunningham and Howarth 2002 |
♀ tail length | 300 mm | N = 1 | Cunningham and Howarth 2002 |
♀ tail length | 320 mm | N = 1 | Cunningham and Howarth 2002 |
♀ tail length | 332 mm | N = 1 | Cunningham and Howarth 2002 |
♀ tail length | 315 mm | N = 1 | Cunningham and Howarth 2002 |
♀ tail length | 315 mm | N = 1 | Cunningham and Howarth 2002 |
♀ tail length | 317 mm | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♀ tail length | 320 mm | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♀ tail length | 300 mm | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♀ tail length | 332 mm | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♀ tail length | 315 mm | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♀ tail length | 330 mm | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♀ tail length | 315 mm | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♀ tail length | 310 mm | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♀ tail length | 330 mm | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♀ tail length | 350 mm | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♀ tail length | 328 mm | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♂ tail length | 307 mm | N = 1 | Cunningham and Howarth 2002 |
♂ tail length | 345 mm | N = 1 | Cunningham and Howarth 2002 |
♂ tail length | 326 mm | N = 1 | Cunningham and Howarth 2002 |
♂ tail length | 350 mm | N = 1 | Cunningham and Howarth 2002 |
♂ tail length | 307 mm | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♂ tail length | 345 mm | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♂ tail length | 350 mm | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♂ tail length | 326 mm | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♂ tail length | 320 mm | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♂ tail length | 320 mm | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♂ tail length | 330 mm | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♂ tail length | 329 mm | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♀ total body length | 657 mm | N = 1 | Cunningham and Howarth 2002 |
♀ total body length | 735 mm | N = 1 | Cunningham and Howarth 2002 |
♀ total body length | 705 mm | N = 1 | Cunningham and Howarth 2002 |
♀ total body length | 762 mm | N = 1 | Cunningham and Howarth 2002 |
♀ total body length | 710 mm | N = 1 | Cunningham and Howarth 2002 |
♀ total body length | 722 mm | N = 1 | Cunningham and Howarth 2002 |
♀ total body length | 657 mm | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♀ total body length | 705 mm | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♀ total body length | 735 mm | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♀ total body length | 762 mm | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♀ total body length | 710 mm | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♀ total body length | 680 mm | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♀ total body length | 725 mm | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♀ total body length | 715 mm | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♀ total body length | 705 mm | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♀ total body length | 725 mm | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♀ total body length | 705 mm | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♂ total body length | 747 mm | N = 1 | Cunningham and Howarth 2002 |
♂ total body length | 800 mm | N = 1 | Cunningham and Howarth 2002 |
♂ total body length | 736 mm | N = 1 | Cunningham and Howarth 2002 |
♂ total body length | 750 mm | N = 1 | Cunningham and Howarth 2002 |
♂ total body length | 747 mm | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♂ total body length | 800 mm | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♂ total body length | 750 mm | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♂ total body length | 736 mm | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♂ total body length | 760 mm | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♂ total body length | 730 mm | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♂ total body length | 700 mm | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
♂ total body length | 725 mm | N = 1 | Smith et al. 2003 |
See also Vulpes, Vulpes alopecoides, Vulpes bengalensis, Vulpes chama, Vulpes corsac, Vulpes ferrilata, Vulpes lagopus, Vulpes macrotis, Vulpes rueppellii, Vulpes sp., Vulpes velox, Vulpes vulpes, Vulpes zerda